Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorZdolec, Nevijo
dc.creatorKotsiri, Aurelia
dc.creatorHouf, Kurt
dc.creatorAlvarez-Ordóñez, Avelino
dc.creatorBlagojević, Bojan
dc.creatorKarabasil, Nedjeljko
dc.creatorSalines, Morgane
dc.creatorAntić, Dragan
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-15T09:26:57Z
dc.date.available2022-11-15T09:26:57Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2304-8158
dc.identifier.urihttps://vet-erinar.vet.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2497
dc.description.abstractInterventions from lairage to the chilling stage of the pig slaughter process are important to reduce microbial contamination of carcasses. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of abattoir interventions in reducing aerobic colony count (ACC), Enterobacteriaceae, generic Escherichia coli, and Yersinia spp. on pig carcasses. The database searches spanned a 30 year period from 1990 to 2021. Following a structured, predefined protocol, 22 articles, which were judged as having a low risk of bias, were used for detailed data extraction and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included data on lairage interventions for live pigs, standard processing procedures for pig carcasses, prechilling interventions, multiple carcass interventions, and carcass chilling. Risk ratios (RRs) for prevalence studies and mean log differences (MDs) for concentration outcomes were calculated using random effects models. The meta-analysis found that scalding under commercial abattoir conditions effectively reduced the prevalence of Enterobacteriaceae (RR: 0.05, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.12, I2 = 87%) and ACC (MD: −2.84, 95% CI: −3.50 to −2.18, I2 = 99%) on pig carcasses. Similarly, significant reductions of these two groups of bacteria on carcasses were also found after singeing (RR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.44, I2 = 90% and MD: −1.95, 95% CI: −2.40 to −1.50, I2 = 96%, respectively). Rectum sealing effectively reduces the prevalence of Y. enterocolitica on pig carcasses (RR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.89, I2 = 0%). Under commercial abattoir conditions, hot water washing significantly reduced ACC (MD: −1.32, 95% CI: −1.93 to −0.71, I2 = 93%) and generic E. coli counts (MD: −1.23, 95% CI: −1.89 to −0.57, I2 = 61%) on pig carcasses. Conventional dry chilling reduced Enterobacteriaceae prevalence on pig carcasses (RR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.48, I2 = 81%). Multiple carcass interventions significantly reduced Enterobacteriaceae prevalence (RR: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.23, I2 = 94%) and ACC on carcasses (MD: −2.85, 95% CI: −3.33 to −2.37, I2 = 97%). The results clearly show that standard processing procedures of scalding and singeing and the hazard-based intervention of hot water washing are effective in reducing indicator bacteria on pig carcasses. The prevalence of Y. enterocolitica on pig carcasses was effectively reduced by the standard procedure of rectum sealing; nevertheless, this was the only intervention for Yersinia investigated under commercial conditions. High heterogeneity among studies and trials investigating interventions and overall lack of large, controlled trials conducted under commercial conditions suggest that more in-depth research is needed.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relationCOST Action 18105 (Risk-based Meat Inspection and Integrated Meat Safety Assurance
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttps://vet-erinar.vet.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2498
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceFoods
dc.subjectEnterobacteriaceae
dc.subjectYersinia
dc.subjectabattoir
dc.subjectaerobic colony count
dc.subjectchilling
dc.subjectgeneric E. coli
dc.subjecthot water washing
dc.subjectinterventions
dc.subjectpig carcasses
dc.titleSystematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Interventions Applied during Primary Processing to Reduce Microbial Contamination on Pig Carcasses
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.licenseBY
dc.citation.volume11
dc.citation.issue14
dc.citation.spage2110
dc.citation.rankM21~
dc.description.otherSupplementary material: [https://vet-erinar.vet.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2498]
dc.identifier.wos00083381410000
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/foods11142110
dc.identifier.pmid35885353
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85136185528
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://veterinar.vet.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/7158/foods-11-02110.pdf
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу