dc.creator | Todorović, Anastasija Z. | |
dc.creator | Krstić, Nikola E. | |
dc.creator | Žikić, Dragan R. | |
dc.creator | Van Bree, Henri JJ. | |
dc.creator | Mlv. Gielen, Ingrid | |
dc.creator | Lazarević Macanović, Mirjana | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-20T07:47:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-20T07:47:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://vet-erinar.vet.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3761 | |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this study was to establish two new methods for measuring the tibial plateau
angle (TPA): proximal tibial circle (PTC) as well as full tibial circle (FTC) method, and
to test their reliability in comparison to the classical method (CM). Three radiologists
implemented each method, and measurements were repeated three times.
The results of consecutive measurements obtained by two observers had excellent
reliability with an interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) greater than 0.9 for all
methods, while measurements obtained by the third observer had good reliability for
the CM (ICC=0.885) and PTC method (ICC=0.851).
The results obtained by the three observers for all methods indicate good reliability for
the PTC and FTC methods (ICC=0.848 and 0.880, respectively) and excellent reliability
for CM (ICC = 0.909); the results of the different observers for each method were not
significantly different.
The significant difference resulting from the applied measurement method (ICC =
0.447 and P<0.01) was confirmed. Statistically significant differences were not found
between the CM and PTC method (P>0.05), while differences between the PTC and
FTC, as well as CM and FTC methods, were statistically significant (P<0.01).
New methods for TPA measurements based on shorter tibial axes may be an alternative
to a method based on the full-length axis. A high correlation between the methods
indicates the precision of each of them. Newly established methods can be used when
the tarsal joint is not included in radiographs or is affected by degenerative changes,
making use of the classical method not possible. | sr |
dc.language.iso | en | sr |
dc.publisher | Beograd : Fakultet veterinarske medicine | sr |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/inst-2020/200143/RS// | sr |
dc.rights | openAccess | sr |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.source | Acta Veterinaria | sr |
dc.subject | dog | sr |
dc.subject | cranial cruciate ligament | sr |
dc.subject | stifle joint | sr |
dc.subject | tibial axis | sr |
dc.subject | tibial plateau angle | sr |
dc.subject | tibial plateau slope | sr |
dc.title | Tibial plateau angle measuremet in dogs – comparison of three different methods | sr |
dc.type | article | sr |
dc.rights.license | BY | sr |
dc.citation.volume | 74 | |
dc.citation.issue | 1 | |
dc.citation.spage | 17 | |
dc.citation.epage | 29 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2478/acve-2024-0002 | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | http://veterinar.vet.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/11254/bitstream_11254.pdf | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | sr |